Native Fish Coalition

Post any useful information here.

Native Fish Coalition

Postby Rusty Spinner on October 23rd, 2017, 8:10 pm

There's a new organization formed to address critical native fisheries issues throughout the nation with an eye towards native salmonids.

Native Fish Coalition resized.jpg
Native Fish Coalition resized.jpg (33.4 KiB) Viewed 854 times


https://www.facebook.com/nativefishcoalition/

From their site: The Native Fish Coalition is a grassroots donor-funded, not-for-profit organization dedicated to the conservation, preservation and restoration of native fish. While most of our members are avid fly anglers, our focus is not limited to so-called “gamefish.” We are primarily – but not exclusively -- focused on salmonids, and the reason for this is twofold: Salmonids are often the species that are most threatened, and what is good for these native “indicator species” is good for all native fish.

It is the belief of the Native Fish Coalition that no stream, river, pond or lake is truly healthy or “restored” until its full complement of native species is intact and it is devoid of non-native species and hatchery-raised fish. Clean water and healthy riparian zones are a necessary foundation for establishing healthy ecosystems, albeit not an absolute indication of overall ecological health. While the complete restoration of native species assemblages is not always attainable, it is our goal.

Our purpose for forming the Native Fish Coalition is to address issues that often fall through the cracks, work alongside like-minded entities to best utilize our unique skill sets and resources, help push for meaningful reform even when that means challenging the status quo, and try to bridge the gap between fish and water conservation organizations. We are part of a small but rapidly growing group of like-minded advocates who hold a shared vision: To protect, preserve and restore our native fish. That shared vision and the structure of the Coalition allows us to achieve consensus and act quickly and decisively to protect this invaluable and irreplaceable resource.

The Native Fish Coalition sees no issue as too big or too small, too easy or too challenging. Our approach is data-driven and our strategy is to use information and education, habitat restoration and enhancement, reclamation and regulations to promote complete and long-term solutions. While concessions are sometimes necessary, we will not agree to ineffective or dangerous compromises, quick fixes or temporary solutions. We see education, hands-on work, funding of worthwhile projects, negotiation, public advocacy and legislation as important tools for achieving our objectives.

To accomplish our goals, we have embraced experienced independent advocates who have dedicated themselves to understanding the many threats facing our native fish and the most effective ways to combat those threats. It is our intent to find common ground wherever possible and work with as many organizations, government agencies, businesses and clubs as we can. If you feel as we do, we would greatly appreciate your support. No donation or offer of help is too small or too large.
Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land. Aldo Leopold
User avatar
Rusty Spinner
 
Posts: 6223
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby Rusty Spinner on October 23rd, 2017, 8:13 pm

State chapters are being formed with several in place currently and several more in the works. Please feel free to contact me for more information or if you are interested in forming a NJ chapter. Today I accepted a role as their fish habitat expert on their national Advisory Council. This organization fills a void that other conservation organizations don't always fill as its focus is only on native fisheries and not wild, but introduced fish like brown trout for example.
Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land. Aldo Leopold
User avatar
Rusty Spinner
 
Posts: 6223
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby Rusty Spinner on November 20th, 2017, 10:17 am

Check out the new website, they did a nice job with it:

https://nativefishcoalition.org/
Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land. Aldo Leopold
User avatar
Rusty Spinner
 
Posts: 6223
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby NJpatbee on November 22nd, 2017, 4:33 pm

I am in favor of the organizations mission statement and spend most of my fishing time chasing wild brookies. But I do not support approaching all waters with the concept of removing all non-native species. This may be effective in some waters and I understand it, but in NJ and much of the Northeast there are certain waters that are well suited to non-native trout (browns and rainbows) and wild populations have existed for many decades. At times browns have replaced the brookie is some waters where the brookie was flourishing which was a mistake - a good example is the Letort Sping Creek where 5+ pound brook trout were not unusual. Since the introduction of the brown trout the brookies are all but gone. At the same time fishing for difficult rising browns on the Letort has become a tradition and part of our Eastern trout fishing lore.

Closer to home, take the upper portions of the South Branch of the Raritan River. In some areas there are plentiful wild brookies alongside wild browns. I could not support eliminating the brown trout population on this water since the native brookies seem to be doing quite well. And what about all the sections of waters that support year round populations of rainbows and browns but are not suitable for brookies? On one WTS I frequent there are plenty of brookies in the upstream section with natural barriers protecting the brookie population from wild brown trout in the lower section. The browns have developed a certain look with bright orange spots that I have leaned to appreciate feel at home with. I would not want to see the brown trout population eliminated.

I may have misread the mission statement but it struck me like an all or nothing approach. I believe in supporting native trout populations but also feel that each water has to be reviewed on an individual basis.
User avatar
NJpatbee
Site Supporter
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: September 11th, 2008, 12:25 pm
Location: Sussex County

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby Rusty Spinner on November 28th, 2017, 10:22 am

NJpatbee wrote:I am in favor of the organizations mission statement and spend most of my fishing time chasing wild brookies. But I do not support approaching all waters with the concept of removing all non-native species. This may be effective in some waters and I understand it, but in NJ and much of the Northeast there are certain waters that are well suited to non-native trout (browns and rainbows) and wild populations have existed for many decades. At times browns have replaced the brookie is some waters where the brookie was flourishing which was a mistake - a good example is the Letort Sping Creek where 5+ pound brook trout were not unusual. Since the introduction of the brown trout the brookies are all but gone. At the same time fishing for difficult rising browns on the Letort has become a tradition and part of our Eastern trout fishing lore.

Closer to home, take the upper portions of the South Branch of the Raritan River. In some areas there are plentiful wild brookies alongside wild browns. I could not support eliminating the brown trout population on this water since the native brookies seem to be doing quite well. And what about all the sections of waters that support year round populations of rainbows and browns but are not suitable for brookies? On one WTS I frequent there are plenty of brookies in the upstream section with natural barriers protecting the brookie population from wild brown trout in the lower section. The browns have developed a certain look with bright orange spots that I have leaned to appreciate feel at home with. I would not want to see the brown trout population eliminated.

I may have misread the mission statement but it struck me like an all or nothing approach. I believe in supporting native trout populations but also feel that each water has to be reviewed on an individual basis.


Pat, the Native Fish Coalition in no way advocates to go 100% native. That would make zero sense. Here's our mission statement: “TO PROTECT, PRESERVE, AND RESTORE NATIVE FISH POPULATIONS THROUGH STEWARDSHIP OF THE FISH AND THEIR HABITATS”

NFC wanted to make sure the organization wouldn't be considered a competitor of sorts with the likes of Trout Unlimited who focuses efforts on both native and non-native trout and salmon. NFC only focuses on native species. You would never see them working to save or restore habitat for non-native species is all. In no way do we advocate the removal of non-natives unless it is feasible to help a critically imperilled species like the rare Maine char, for example.

You may/may not know that the NJ Division of Fish & Wildlife is currently engaged in certain brook trout streams in removing non-native brown trout that share habitat with our native brookes.......and that trend I see continuing at least here in NJ.
Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land. Aldo Leopold
User avatar
Rusty Spinner
 
Posts: 6223
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby NJpatbee on November 29th, 2017, 2:34 pm

Brian - I am concerned about the following statement on their website:

It is the belief of the Native Fish Coalition that no stream, river, pond or lake is truly healthy or “restored” until its full complement of native species is intact and it is devoid of non-native species and hatchery-raised fish
User avatar
NJpatbee
Site Supporter
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: September 11th, 2008, 12:25 pm
Location: Sussex County

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby The Royal Coachman on November 29th, 2017, 7:26 pm

NJpatbee wrote:Brian - I am concerned about the following statement on their website:

It is the belief of the Native Fish Coalition that no stream, river, pond or lake is truly healthy or “restored” until its full complement of native species is intact and it is devoid of non-native species and hatchery-raised fish


That quote is pretty radical. Can you imagine the Big Delaware with no Smallmouth or Walleye? or the upper Delaware with no Trout?
I fish because the voices in my head tell me to
User avatar
The Royal Coachman
 
Posts: 665
Joined: October 5th, 2008, 7:57 am
Location: Hackettstown

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby Rusty Spinner on November 30th, 2017, 5:40 pm

The Royal Coachman wrote:
NJpatbee wrote:Brian - I am concerned about the following statement on their website:

It is the belief of the Native Fish Coalition that no stream, river, pond or lake is truly healthy or “restored” until its full complement of native species is intact and it is devoid of non-native species and hatchery-raised fish


That quote is pretty radical. Can you imagine the Big Delaware with no Smallmouth or Walleye? or the upper Delaware with no Trout?


There is absolutely nothing radical about it. It is simply the truth. That said, the mission is not to wipe out all non-natives :lol:
Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land. Aldo Leopold
User avatar
Rusty Spinner
 
Posts: 6223
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby Rusty Spinner on December 1st, 2017, 9:48 am

I should add that I am in on the ground floor with this organization, so I'm not just reading this stuff for the first time like most of you are. The comments are interesting and we will discuss it among ourselves to make certain the messages are clear.
Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land. Aldo Leopold
User avatar
Rusty Spinner
 
Posts: 6223
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: Native Fish Coalition

Postby Twism86 on December 14th, 2017, 2:53 pm

I think adjusting that quote to "and it is devoid of harmful non-native species and hatchery-raised fish." Would be better. There are plenty of streams where for one, that is impossible and two, the non-native fish do not pose a threat to native species where they can live along side one another and both thrive.
"Stupidity is scary, but genius is scarier.
Genius topples nations, genius built the atom bomb."
User avatar
Twism86
 
Posts: 5854
Joined: September 10th, 2008, 1:18 am
Location: Cranford, NJ


Return to Issues/Activities/Conservation/TU

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest