Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
Don't know either the little J nor really the Musky all that well, but every river has a carrying capacity that limits how many fish it can sustain.
The advantage of fingerlings is just that you can stock so many, however, the river conditions still have to support their ability to survive
to adulthood. At least predation is limited (compared to fingerlings) when stocking larger trout, and they still have to hold over and be able to reproduce.
Just my ignorant thoughts.
Carry on.
The advantage of fingerlings is just that you can stock so many, however, the river conditions still have to support their ability to survive
to adulthood. At least predation is limited (compared to fingerlings) when stocking larger trout, and they still have to hold over and be able to reproduce.
Just my ignorant thoughts.
Carry on.
----
living in the land of clammies
living in the land of clammies
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
About 10 years ago the State stocked 10's of thousands of fingerling brookies at several bridges below the Toms River TCA and continued to do so for several years. Within a weeks time some of those fish made their up to the TCA and were caught for a couple of weeks and pretty much disappeared and there was no evidence that I am aware of that these fish stayed around to grow to larger size. These fish were stocked in an effort to establish a sea runof brookies and whether they actually made their way to the salt and eaten by bluefish or stripers etc is anybody!s guess but not aware of any that survived.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
The musky is a big river especially in the lower stretches and cold. They stocked surplus rainbows years ago and the next year they fought like wild fish. Rainbows don't reproduce well in jersey except for a few streams. If you have fished rivers that exclusively stock fingerlings the fishery is much different than one that has stocked adults. Fingerling stocked rivers produce fish that fight like wild fish and act like wild fish.robtf wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 1:55 pmDon't know either the little J nor really the Musky all that well, but every river has a carrying capacity that limits how many fish it can sustain.
The advantage of fingerlings is just that you can stock so many, however, the river conditions still have to support their ability to survive
to adulthood. At least predation is limited (compared to fingerlings) when stocking larger trout, and they still have to hold over and be able to reproduce.
Just my ignorant thoughts.
Carry on.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
My hunch would be since fingerling stocked fish act more like wild trout, reproduction would have a better chance. The musky has some reproduction, but is mainly a out and take fishery and managed as one.
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
The musky has some reproduction, but is mainly a out and take fishery and managed as one.
[/quote]
Well said
[/quote]
Well said
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
To answer Johnw questions on returning Brook Trout. Here a few photos of Brook Trout caught from the Raritan river (save the mishandling comments please) when the State was stocking Brook Trout upriver. These trout were caught near the fish ladder in Bound Brook, not far from the tideline in New Brunswick. (except one) I sent these photos to the Sea Run Brook Trout Coalition in Massachusetts and they were pleasantly surprised, so much so they wanted to come down and start PIT tagging Brook Trout ! Personally witnessed quite a few fat pink bellied Brook Trout caught near the fish ladder. Still to this day an average of 100 trout a year swim UP through the fish ladder, the fish ladder is not near any stocking points.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_3957.jpg (61.71 KiB) Viewed 24416 times
-
- IMG_0605.JPG (2.67 MiB) Viewed 24416 times
-
- vid snap.jpg (27.96 KiB) Viewed 24416 times
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
those some nice 1's................BillSmith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:33 pmTo answer Johnw questions on returning Brook Trout. Here a few photos of Brook Trout caught from the Raritan river (save the mishandling comments please) when the State was stocking Brook Trout upriver. These trout were caught near the fish ladder in Bound Brook, not far from the tideline in New Brunswick. (except one) I sent these photos to the Sea Run Brook Trout Coalition in Massachusetts and they were pleasantly surprised, so much so they wanted to come down and start PIT tagging Brook Trout ! Personally witnessed quite a few fat pink bellied Brook Trout caught near the fish ladder. Still to this day an average of 100 trout a year swim UP through the fish ladder, the fish ladder is not near any stocking points.
Was known as Troutman1
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
I don't know if it matters.When I was younger, about 35 years ago, I caught a brookie like that in Clinton, next to Wargo's.... I killed it, the flesh was bright orange and it fought like a beast...last trout I knowingly killed...BillSmith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:33 pmTo answer Johnw questions on returning Brook Trout. Here a few photos of Brook Trout caught from the Raritan river (save the mishandling comments please) when the State was stocking Brook Trout upriver. These trout were caught near the fish ladder in Bound Brook, not far from the tideline in New Brunswick. (except one) I sent these photos to the Sea Run Brook Trout Coalition in Massachusetts and they were pleasantly surprised, so much so they wanted to come down and start PIT tagging Brook Trout ! Personally witnessed quite a few fat pink bellied Brook Trout caught near the fish ladder. Still to this day an average of 100 trout a year swim UP through the fish ladder, the fish ladder is not near any stocking points.
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
That happened on the Manasquan as well, which is what gave the idea for the "Sea Run Brown Trout" program they tried for years. But the truth is that are very few returns compared to the overwhelming numbers of stocked trout. Most likely just due to poor habitat to support the full sea run life cycle.BillSmith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:33 pmTo answer Johnw questions on returning Brook Trout. Here a few photos of Brook Trout caught from the Raritan river (save the mishandling comments please) when the State was stocking Brook Trout upriver. These trout were caught near the fish ladder in Bound Brook, not far from the tideline in New Brunswick. (except one) I sent these photos to the Sea Run Brook Trout Coalition in Massachusetts and they were pleasantly surprised, so much so they wanted to come down and start PIT tagging Brook Trout ! Personally witnessed quite a few fat pink bellied Brook Trout caught near the fish ladder. Still to this day an average of 100 trout a year swim UP through the fish ladder, the fish ladder is not near any stocking points.
And this is just a side note to the issue of fingerlings vs. adult trout. The fingerling experiments on the Toms and Squan, as well as the surplus brown experiments on the Squan, showed very little promise.
But I don't think the discussion of salter brookies, sea run browns, or "steelhead" rainbows has direct bearing on the discussion of fingerling vs. adults in the Musky.
----
living in the land of clammies
living in the land of clammies
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
Those fingerling trout were stocked in places that showed no in stream spawning. The idea of stocking them in the musky would be to try and create a breeding population of some size, if that didn't happen you create a fishery with fish that at least act wild.robtf wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 1:39 pmThat happened on the Manasquan as well, which is what gave the idea for the "Sea Run Brown Trout" program they tried for years. But the truth is that are very few returns compared to the overwhelming numbers of stocked trout. Most likely just due to poor habitat to support the full sea run life cycle.BillSmith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:33 pmTo answer Johnw questions on returning Brook Trout. Here a few photos of Brook Trout caught from the Raritan river (save the mishandling comments please) when the State was stocking Brook Trout upriver. These trout were caught near the fish ladder in Bound Brook, not far from the tideline in New Brunswick. (except one) I sent these photos to the Sea Run Brook Trout Coalition in Massachusetts and they were pleasantly surprised, so much so they wanted to come down and start PIT tagging Brook Trout ! Personally witnessed quite a few fat pink bellied Brook Trout caught near the fish ladder. Still to this day an average of 100 trout a year swim UP through the fish ladder, the fish ladder is not near any stocking points.
And this is just a side note to the issue of fingerlings vs. adult trout. The fingerling experiments on the Toms and Squan, as well as the surplus brown experiments on the Squan, showed very little promise.
But I don't think the discussion of salter brookies, sea run browns, or "steelhead" rainbows has direct bearing on the discussion of fingerling vs. adults in the Musky.
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
Connecticut has a interesting program that was in Trout magazine awhile back where they harvested adult wild trout , fertilized the eggs with wild trout sperm , incubated them At the state hatchery and raised them until they were I believe fingerling , then released them . So they shared the dna of wild trout even though they had a little help . But as they got older didn't hurt the wild trout blood line .
- Rusty Spinner
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 6:35 pm
- Location: Flanders, NJ
- Contact:
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
That brook trout is 100% stocked holdover. You can clearly see regeneration of both the pectoral and pelvic fins. Stocked fish can literally swim hundreds of miles, so the fact that the fish ladder is not near a stocking point is totally irrelevant. Fish swim. Usually downstream. That was not a sea run fish. NJ has zero sea run trout now that the Muddysquan surplus brown trout stocking program has been over for years.BillSmith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 6:33 pmTo answer Johnw questions on returning Brook Trout. Here a few photos of Brook Trout caught from the Raritan river (save the mishandling comments please) when the State was stocking Brook Trout upriver. These trout were caught near the fish ladder in Bound Brook, not far from the tideline in New Brunswick. (except one) I sent these photos to the Sea Run Brook Trout Coalition in Massachusetts and they were pleasantly surprised, so much so they wanted to come down and start PIT tagging Brook Trout ! Personally witnessed quite a few fat pink bellied Brook Trout caught near the fish ladder. Still to this day an average of 100 trout a year swim UP through the fish ladder, the fish ladder is not near any stocking points.
"A sinking fly is closer to Hell" - Unknown
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
If I remember correctly the State stocked some fingerling rainbows in the lower end of Hockhocson Brook in an effort to create a steelhead run in the Navesink River, and as far as I know it met the same fate as the Toms and Manasquan experiments.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:08 pm
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
I believe they do that on the Farmington, but i may be incorrect.Jaybird wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:41 pmConnecticut has a interesting program that was in Trout magazine awhile back where they harvested adult wild trout , fertilized the eggs with wild trout sperm , incubated them At the state hatchery and raised them until they were I believe fingerling , then released them . So they shared the dna of wild trout even though they had a little help . But as they got older didn't hurt the wild trout blood line .
- coaltrout
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 2:47 pm
- Location: https://goo.gl/maps/KZAZHSGSBRnizQNh9
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
How about the delaware, if any river has sea runs in NJ why not that river?
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
You are correct Sirjoe_panella wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:59 pmI believe they do that on the Farmington, but i may be incorrect.Jaybird wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:41 pmConnecticut has a interesting program that was in Trout magazine awhile back where they harvested adult wild trout , fertilized the eggs with wild trout sperm , incubated them At the state hatchery and raised them until they were I believe fingerling , then released them . So they shared the dna of wild trout even though they had a little help . But as they got older didn't hurt the wild trout blood line .
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
I witnessed them do this on the beaverkill in the early 2000s..shortly after the second drought fishkill....however they were not released as fingerlings, just gr8 looking stocked trout...Jaybird wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:08 pmYou are correct Sirjoe_panella wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:59 pmI believe they do that on the Farmington, but i may be incorrect.Jaybird wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 2:41 pmConnecticut has a interesting program that was in Trout magazine awhile back where they harvested adult wild trout , fertilized the eggs with wild trout sperm , incubated them At the state hatchery and raised them until they were I believe fingerling , then released them . So they shared the dna of wild trout even though they had a little help . But as they got older didn't hurt the wild trout blood line .
- BiggerThomas
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:44 pm
- Location: Whenever somebody's looking to be free...look in their eyes--you'll see me.
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
Good question, CT. I'm not an expert, but I'd think it impossible to know the exact osteichthyes inventory of an entire aquatic ecosystem so perhaps it's possible to have sea runs in the Delaware.
But speaking of fish swimming up river, the Delaware Shad should be running soon. Here's some info from the NJDFW webpage:
Every year American shad migrate up the Delaware River to spawn. The numbers and timing of the "shad run" vary year to year depending on water temperature and conditions. Having accurate, up-to-date information on the run can greatly impact on angling success and enjoyment (you can find that info on this website: https://www.drsfa.org/).
"Most anglers spend their lives in making rules for trout, and trout spend theirs in breaking them."
-From Letters to Young Fly-Fishers, (1926) Sir George Aston,
-From Letters to Young Fly-Fishers, (1926) Sir George Aston,
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
I think it's safe to say trout migrate into tribs from the Delaware , and not just the tail water part . I don't fish the muskie but if the lower river is as cold as everyone says I'm sure it's a thermal refuge for trout in that area . Maybe not big numbers but in sure there are probably a few .
Re: Public Meeting on Trout Stocking Program February 29
You are correct. There was an older attempt at this, then later (before I moved away from it) they did surplus bow fingerlings in again for a few years.
The only report I heard was a guy who worked with Dave @ The Fly Hatch who said (*said* key word) that he caught a steelhead (sw 'bow) in the Navensink
*one time*. If he wasn't just shooting the breeze, that still means his was the sole catch I ever heard of for a salt-run salmonid in that area (The Hockhockson
eventually feeds into the Navesink, but the fish could have been from any number of sources, again, if true)
----
living in the land of clammies
living in the land of clammies